Neoplatonism.org

Ennead III.8 [30], On Nature and Contemplation and the One, chapter 4

καὶ εἴ τις δὲ αὐτὴν ἔροιτο τίνος ἕνεκα ποιεῖ…

Nature speaks. Asked why it makes, it says it is silent, that what comes to be is its spectacle, and that the lines of bodies fall out of it as it contemplates, as a geometer draws. Its contemplation is dim, like sleep compared with waking, and human action is the same weakness: a shadow of contemplation for those who cannot see with intellect.

What it drew on

Outside the pilot

Behind this chapter stand Plato's lovers of spectacle (Republic V 475d) and his craftsman of the Timaeus, and Plato is deliberately outside this library, which begins with Plotinus. The place above the text is empty because the source is out of scope, not because it is unknown.

Editorial scope: the fourteen names of the landing chain begin at Plotinus.

The text

porphyrian III.8 · chronological 30 · chapter 4 · volkmann page 334-336

καὶ εἴ τις δὲ αὐτὴν ἔροιτο τίνος ἕνεκα ποιεῖ, εἰ τοῦ ἐρωτῶντος ἐθέλοι ἐπαίειν καὶ λέγειν, εἴποι ἄν: ‘ἐχρῆν μὲν μὴ ἐρωτᾶν, ἀλλὰ συνιέναι καὶ αὐτὸν σιωπῇ, ὥσπερ ἐγὼ σιωπῶ καὶ οὐκ εἴθισμαι λέγειν. τί οὖν συνιέναι; ὅτι τὸ γενόμενόν ἐστι θέαμα ἐμὸν [ἐμοῦ] σιωπησάσης καὶ φύσει γενόμενον θεώρημα, καί μοι γενομένῃ ἐκ θεωρίας τῆς ὡδὶ τὴν φύσιν ἔχειν φιλοθεάμονα ὑπάρχει καὶ τὸ θεωροῦν μου θεώρημα ποιεῖ, ὥσπερ οἱ γεωμέτραι θεωροῦντες γράφουσιν: ἀλλ’ ἐμοῦ μὴ γραφούσης, θεωρούσης δέ, ὑφίστανται αἱ τῶν σωμάτων γραμμαὶ ὥσπερ ἐκπίπτουσαι. καί μοι τὸ τῆς μητρὸς καὶ τῶν γειναμένων ὑπάρχει πάθος: καὶ γὰρ ἐκεῖνοι εἰσὶν ἐκ θεωρίας καὶ ἡ γένεσις ἡ ἐμὴ ἐκείνων οὐδὲν πραξάντων, ἀλλ’ ὄντων μειζόνων λόγων καὶ θεωρούντων αὐτοὺς ἐγὼ γεγέννημαι.’ τί οὖν ταῦτα βούλεται; ὡς ἡ λεγομένη φύσις ψυχὴ οὖσα, γέννημα ψυχῆς προτέρας δυνατώτερον ζώσης, ἡσυχῇ ἐν ἑαυτῇ θεωρίαν ἔχουσα οὐ πρὸς τὸ ἄνω οὐδ’ αὖ ἔτι πρὸς τὸ κάτω, στᾶσα δὲ ἐν ᾧ ἔστιν, ἐν τῇ αὐτῆς στάσει καὶ οἷον συναισθήσει, τῇ συνέσει ταύτῃ καὶ συναισθήσει τὸ μετ’ αὐτὴν εἶδεν ὡς οἷόν τε αὐτῇ καὶ οὐκέτι ἐζήτησεν ἄλλα θεώρημα ἀποτελέσασα ἀγλαὸν καὶ χάριεν. καὶ εἴ τις βούλεται σύνεσίν τινα ἢ αἴσθησιν αὐτῇ διδόναι, οὐχ οἵαν λέγομεν ἐπὶ τῶν ἄλλων τὴν αἴσθησιν ἢ τὴν σύνεσιν, ἀλλ’ οἷον εἴ τις τὴν τοῦ ὕπνου [τῇ] τοῦ ἐγρηγορότος προσεικάσειε. θεωροῦσα γὰρ θεώρημα αὐτῆς ἀναπαύεται γενόμενον αὐτῇ ἐκ τοῦ ἐν αὐτῇ καὶ σὺν αὐτῇ μένειν καὶ θεώρημα εἶναι: καὶ θεωρία ἄψοφος, ἀμυδροτέρα δέ. ἑτέρα γὰρ αὐτῆς εἰς θέαν ἐναργεστέρα, ἡ δὲ εἴδωλον θεωρίας ἄλλης. ταύτῃ δὴ καὶ τὸ γεννηθὲν ὑπ’ αὐτῆς ἀσθενὲς παντάπασιν, ὅτι ἀσθενοῦσα θεωρία ἀσθενὲς θεώρημα ποιεῖ: ἐπεὶ καὶ ἄνθρωποι, ὅταν ἀσθενήσωσιν εἰς τὸ θεωρεῖν, σκιὰν θεωρίας καὶ λόγου τὴν πρᾶξιν ποιοῦνται. ὅτι γὰρ μὴ ἱκανὸν αὐτοῖς τὸ τῆς θεωρίας ὑπ’ ἀσθενείας ψυχῆς, λαβεῖν οὐ δυνάμενοι τὸ θέαμα ἱκανῶς καὶ διὰ τοῦτο οὐ πληρούμενοι, ἐφιέμενοι δὲ αὐτὸ ἰδεῖν, εἰς πρᾶξιν φέρονται, ἵνα ἴδωσιν, ὃ μὴ νῷ ἐδύναντο. ὅταν γοῦν ποιῶσι, καὶ αὐτοὶ ὁρᾶν βούλονται αὐτὸ καὶ θεωρεῖν καὶ αἰσθάνεσθαι καὶ τοὺς ἄλλους, ὅταν ἡ πρόθεσις αὐτοῖς ὡς οἷόν τε πρᾶξις ᾖ. πανταχοῦ δὴ ἀνευρήσομεν τὴν ποίησιν καὶ τὴν πρᾶξιν ἢ ἀσθένειαν θεωρίας ἢ παρακολούθημα: ἀσθένειαν μέν, εἰ μηδέν τις ἔχοι μετὰ τὸ πραχθέν: παρακολούθημα δέ, εἰ ἔχοι ἄλλο πρὸ τούτου κρεῖττον τοῦ ποιηθέντος θεωρεῖν. τίς γὰρ θεωρεῖν τὸ ἀληθινὸν δυνάμενος προηγουμένως ἔρχεται ἐπὶ τὸ εἴδωλον τοῦ ἀληθινοῦ; μαρτυροῦσι δὲ καὶ οἱ νωθέστεροι τῶν παίδων, οἳ πρὸς τὰς μαθήσεις καὶ θεωρίας ἀδυνάτως ἔχοντες ἐπὶ τὰς τέχνας καὶ τὰς ἐργασίας καταφέρονται.

And if someone were to ask nature why it makes, if it were willing to listen to the questioner and speak, it would say: 'You ought not to have asked, but to have understood, you too, in silence, as I am silent and am not accustomed to speak. Understood what? That what comes to be is my spectacle, made while I was silent, an object of contemplation come to be by nature; and that, since I came to be from a contemplation of this kind, I have a nature that loves spectacle; and what contemplates in me makes an object of contemplation, as the geometers draw as they contemplate. But I do not draw; I contemplate, and the lines of bodies come to subsist as if falling out of me. And what happened to my mother and to those who begot me is mine too: for they also are from contemplation, and my birth came about with them doing nothing; but because they are greater rational forms and contemplate themselves, I have been begotten.' What does this mean? That what is called nature, being a soul, the offspring of a prior soul that lives more powerfully, having contemplation quietly within itself, directed neither upward nor yet downward, but standing where it is, in its own stillness and a kind of self-perception — by this understanding and self-perception it saw what comes after it, as far as it could, and sought nothing further, having brought to completion an object of contemplation, splendid and graceful. And if one wishes to grant it some understanding or perception, it is not the perception or understanding we speak of in other things, but as if one were to compare the awareness of sleep with that of one awake. For it contemplates its own object of contemplation and is at rest, an object that has come to be for it from its remaining in itself and with itself and being an object of contemplation; and its contemplation is soundless, but dimmer. For there is another, clearer to see than it; this one is an image of another contemplation. This is why what is begotten by it is altogether weak: a weak contemplation makes a weak object of contemplation. So also human beings, when they are too weak for contemplating, make action a shadow of contemplation and of reason. For because contemplation is not enough for them, through weakness of soul — unable to grasp the spectacle adequately and so not filled by it, yet aiming to see it — they are carried into action, so as to see what they could not see with intellect. At any rate, when they make something, they want to see it themselves and to contemplate it, and they want others to perceive it, whenever their purpose is, as far as possible, action. Everywhere, then, we shall find that making and action are either a weakness of contemplation or an accompaniment of it: a weakness, if one has nothing beyond what has been done; an accompaniment, if one has something else, prior to this, better than what has been made, to contemplate. For who, able to contemplate what is true, goes first of all to the image of what is true? The duller children bear witness too: unable for learning and contemplation, they sink down to the crafts and manual work.

Nature's speech is set in quotation marks by Volkmann. φιλοθεάμονα, 'that loves spectacle', recalls the φιλοθεάμονες of Plato, Republic V 475d. The geometers' 'drawing' plays on θεώρημα as 'theorem', its ordinary sense, while the glossary keeps 'object of contemplation'. συναίσθησις is 'self-perception', kept in the family of αἴσθησις 'perception'. Volkmann brackets ἐμοῦ in 'my spectacle' as a deletion; the English follows the text without it. He also brackets τῇ before τοῦ ἐγρηγορότος; without it the comparison of sleep and waking must be understood rather than read, and the English supplies it, as the sentence requires on either reading. λόγου in 'a shadow of contemplation and of reason' is the ordinary sense (glossary). Volkmann prints αὐτ- where the reflexive is meant; the English follows the sense ('itself').

Apparatus
  • [Volkmann p.334, l.25 – p.335, l.6] Volkmann sets nature's answer in quotation marks, from ‘ἐχρῆν to γεγέννημαι.’; the transcription omits them. Restored.
  • [Volkmann p.334, l.28] Volkmann brackets ἐμοῦ as a deletion in θέαμα ἐμὸν [ἐμοῦ] σιωπησάσης; the transcription drops the brackets.
  • [Volkmann p.335, l.18] Volkmann brackets τῇ as a deletion in τὴν τοῦ ὕπνου [τῇ] τοῦ ἐγρηγορότος; the transcription drops the brackets.
  • [Volkmann p.335, ll.6, 10–11, 19, 20] αὐτοὺς, αὐτῆς (twice), and ἐν αὐτῇ καὶ σὺν αὐτῇ as printed; the transcription normalises all five to the reflexive.
  • [Volkmann p.336, ll.4, 5] Raised stops after παρακολούθημα and πραχθέν, dropped by the transcription, restored.
  • [Volkmann p.336, l.8] εἴδωλον as printed; the transcription drops the accent.

Greek collated line by line against the Volkmann plate (vol. 1, pp. 334–336); every departure of the First1KGreek transcription from the printed page is corrected and recorded in the apparatus.

Edition
Volkmann, Leipzig, 1883-1884 — Bibliotheca Teubneriana
Scan
archive.org
Digital base
Volkmann, Teubner 1883-84 (First1KGreek, CC BY-SA 4.0)
OCR status
proofed
Translator
Wroot Press draft

In the thread Forms and generation, step iii of viii.

What drew on it

ProclusElements of Theologyel.56, el.57unnamed borrowing

Nature's 'greater rational forms' that beget without acting become Proclus's axioms: what the secondary produces, the prior produces more, and every cause acts before its effect and beyond it. The Liber de causis opens with the same doctrine (prop. 1).

prop 56 · creuzer page 88

PropositionΠᾶν τὸ ὑπὸ τῶν δευτέρων παραγόμενον, καὶ ἀπὸ τῶν προτέρων καὶ αἰτιωτέρων παράγεται μειζόνως, ἀφ᾽ ὧν καὶ τὰ δεύτερα παρήγετο.
PropositionEverything that is produced by secondary things is also produced, in greater measure, by the prior and more causal things from which the secondary things too were produced.

Εἰ γὰρ τὸ δεύτερον ὅλην ἔχει τὴν οὐσίαν ἀπὸ τοῦ πρὸ αὐτοῦ, καὶ ἡ δύναμις αὐτῷ τοῦ παράγειν ἐκεῖθεν (καὶ γὰρ αἱ δυνάμεις παρακτικαὶ κατ᾽ οὐσίαν εἰσὶν ἐν τοῖς παράγουσι, καὶ συμπληροῦσιν αὐτῶν τὴν οὐσίαν)· εἰ δὲ τὴν τοῦ παράγειν δύναμιν ἀπὸ τῆς ὑπερκειμένης αἰτίας ἔλαχε, παρ᾽ ἐκείνης ἔχει τὸ εἶναι αἴτιον, ὧν ἐστιν αἴτιον, μετρηθὲν ἐκεῖθεν κατὰ τὴν ὑποστατικὴν δύναμιν. Εἰ δὲ τοῦτο, καὶ τὰ ἀπ᾽ αὐτοῦ προϊόντα αἰτιατά ἐστι διὰ τὸ πρὸ αὐτοῦ. Τὸ γὰρ θάτερον ἀποτελέσαι αἴτιον, καὶ θάτερον αἰτιατὸν ἀποτελεῖ· εἰ δὲ τοῦτο, καὶ τὸ αἰτιατὸν ἐκεῖθεν ἀποτελεῖται τοιοῦτον· ἀλλὰ μὴν, ὅτι καὶ μειζόνως ἐκεῖθεν, δῆλον. Εἰ γὰρ τὴν αἰτίαν τοῦ παράγειν αὐτὸ τῷ δευτέρῳ δέδωκεν, εἶχεν ἄρα πρώτως ταύτην τὴν αἰτίαν, καὶ διὰ τοῦτο καὶ τὸ δεύτερον ἐγέννα, τὴν τοῦ δευτέρου γεννᾶν δύναμιν ἐκεῖθεν λαβόν. Εἰ δὲ τὸ μὲν κατὰ μέθεξιν ἐγένετο παρακτικόν, τὸ δὲ κατὰ μετάδοσιν καὶ πρώτως, μειζόνως αἴτιον ἐκεῖνο, τὸ καὶ ἄλλῳ τῆς γεννητικῆς τῷ ἐφεξῆς δυνάμεως μεταδεδωκός.

For if the secondary has its whole essence from what is prior to it, its power of producing also comes from there (for productive powers are in producers in accordance with their essence, and fill out their essence); and if it obtained the power of producing from the cause set above it, then it has from that cause its being a cause of the things it causes, measured from there by its power of giving hypostasis. And if this is so, the things that proceed from it are caused things because of what is prior to it. For to make the one a cause is also to make the other a caused thing; and if this is so, the caused thing too is made what it is from there. That it is so from there in greater measure is plain. For if it gave the secondary the cause of producing, then it had this cause primarily, and for that reason it generated the secondary as well, the secondary having received from there its power of generating. And if the one became productive by participation, while the other is productive by imparting and primarily, then that one is the cause in greater measure — the one that imparted the generative power to another, to what comes next after it.

Creuzer's note (1) records that codex A numbers this proposition νζ΄ (57) — a one-off numbering divergence in the manuscript, not in Creuzer's text. Note (8) confirms Portus had already conjectured ἄλλῳ, which is why Creuzer's facing Latin is a reworking of Portus rather than an independent version. οὐσία is rendered 'essence' throughout the Greek units, to keep 'being' for τὸ ὄν and 'substance' for Latin substantia as the glossary requires. ὑποστατικὴ δύναμις is rendered 'power of giving hypostasis', holding the glossary's 'hypostasis' for the ὑπόστασις family rather than the smoother 'constitutive power'. In the last movement of the proof, ἐκεῖθεν λαβόν may attach either to the first cause or to the secondary; the English takes it of the secondary, which is how the argument runs.

Apparatus
  • (1) A. νζ.
  • (2) Adjeci καὶ ex A. Edit. παραγόμενον, ἀπὸ τ. πρ.
  • (3) A. πρακτικαί. perperam, ut saepius.
  • (4) Abest τὴν a cod. MS.
  • (5) Secutus sum codicem A. Edit. τῷ δευτέρῳ τοῦ παράγειν αὐτῷ.
  • (6) Ita A. Edit. γεννᾷ.
  • (7) Lectio codicis A. Edit. μετά.
  • (8) A. ἄλλῳ. Edit. ἄλλο. Sed illud jam conjecerat Portus.

Numbered νς΄ in Creuzer's edition.

Edition
Creuzer, Frankfurt, 1822 — Initia philosophiae ac theologiae ex Platonicis fontibus ducta, Pars III
Scan
archive.org
OCR status
none
Translator
Wroot Press draft

prop 57 · creuzer page 90

PropositionΠᾶν αἴτιον καὶ πρὸ τοῦ αἰτιατοῦ ἐνεργεῖ, καὶ μετ᾽ αὐτὸ πλειόνων ἐστὶν ὑποστατικόν.
PropositionEvery cause both acts before the thing it causes and, after that thing, gives hypostasis to more things.

ᾗ γάρ ἐστιν αἴτιον, τελειότερόν ἐστι καὶ δυνατώτερον τοῦ μετ᾽ αὐτό· καὶ εἰ τοῦτο, πλειόνων αἴτιον. Δυνάμεως γὰρ μείζονος πλείω παράγειν· ἴσης δὲ τὰ ἴσα, καὶ τῆς ἐλάσσονος ἐλάσσω. Καὶ ἡ μὲν τὰ μείζονα ἐν τοῖς ὁμοίοις δυναμένη δύναμις καὶ τὰ ἐλάσσονα δύναται· ἡ δὲ τὰ ἐλάσσονα δυναμένη οὐκ ἐξ ἀνάγκης τὰ μείζω δυνήσεται. Εἰ οὖν δυνατώτερον τὸ αἴτιον, πλειόνων ἐστὶ παρακτικόν. ἀλλὰ μὴν ὅσα δύναται τὸ αἰτιατόν, μειζόνως ἐκεῖνο δύναται. Πᾶν γὰρ τὸ ὑπὸ τῶν δευτέρων παραγόμενον ὑπὸ τῶν προτέρων καὶ αἰτιωτέρων παράγεται μειζόνως. Συνυφίστησιν ἄρα αὐτῷ πάντα, ὅσα πέφυκε παράγειν· εἰ δὲ καὶ αὐτὸ πρότερον παράγει, δῆλον δήπουθεν, ὅτι πρὸ αὐτοῦ ἐνεργεῖ κατὰ τὴν παρακτικὴν αὐτοῦ ἐνέργειαν. ἅπαν ἄρα αἴτιον καὶ πρὸ τοῦ αἰτιατοῦ ἐνεργεῖ, καὶ σὺν αὐτῷ, καὶ μετ᾽ αὐτὸ ἄλλα ὑφίστησιν. ἐκ δὴ τούτων φανερόν, ὅτι ὅσων μὲν αἰτία ψυχή, καὶ νοῦς αἴτιος. Οὐχ ὅσων δὲ νοῦς, καὶ ψυχὴ αἰτία· ἀλλὰ καὶ πρὸ ψυχῆς ἐνεργεῖ. Καὶ ἃ δίδωσι ψυχὴ τοῖς δευτέροις, δίδωσι καὶ νοῦς μειζόνως. Καὶ μηκέτι ψυχῆς ἐνεργούσης νοῦς ἐλλάμπει τὰς ἑαυτοῦ δόσεις, οἷς μὴ δέδωκε ψυχὴ ἑαυτήν. Καὶ γὰρ τὸ ἄψυχον, καθόσον εἴδους μετέσχε, νοῦ μετέχει καὶ τῆς τοῦ νοῦ ποιήσεως.

For in so far as it is a cause, it is more complete and more powerful than what comes after it; and if so, it is the cause of more things. For it belongs to a greater power to produce more, to an equal power to produce equal things, and to a lesser power to produce less. And the power that is capable of the greater things among things of like kind is capable of the lesser as well, while the power capable of the lesser will not necessarily be capable of the greater. If, then, the cause is more powerful, it is productive of more things. And indeed, whatever the thing it causes is capable of, the cause is capable of in greater measure. For everything that is produced by secondary things is produced in greater measure by the prior and more causal things. It therefore gives hypostasis, along with itself, to all that it is of a nature to produce; and if it also produces that thing first, it is surely plain that it acts before it, in accordance with its own productive activity. Every cause, therefore, acts before the thing it causes, and together with it, and after it gives hypostasis to other things. From this it is evident that of whatever soul is the cause, intellect is a cause as well. But soul is not the cause of everything intellect causes; intellect acts before soul as well. And what soul gives to secondary things, intellect gives too, in greater measure. And when soul is no longer acting, intellect still irradiates its own gifts upon the things to which soul has not given itself. For even a soulless thing, in so far as it has participated in form, participates in intellect and in intellect's making.

This proposition restates El. 56 verbatim inside its own proof (Πᾶν γὰρ τὸ ὑπὸ τῶν δευτέρων παραγόμενον ὑπὸ τῶν προτέρων καὶ αἰτιωτέρων παράγεται μειζόνως) — which is why Aquinas cites 56 and 57 together as the source of LdC 1. Creuzer's note (1) again records codex A one number ahead (νη΄ = 58); the same +1 divergence stands at El. 56, so it is a running feature of codex A here, not an isolated slip. The sentence Creuzer prints inside this proof is El. 56's own lemma, and the English repeats El. 56's English word for word so that the self-citation is visible on the page. ἐλλάμπειν is rendered 'irradiate' here and at El. 70.

Apparatus
  • (1) A. νη.
  • (2) εἰ adjeci ex A. hac sententia: »et si hoc locum habet.«
  • (3) Edit. ἡ μὲν μείζονα. Ego articulum adjeci ex cod. A.
  • (4) A. μὴν καὶ ὅσα.
  • (5) A. μετ᾽ αὐτό· ἄλλα.
  • (6) Exhibui lectionem codicis A. In editione deest τοῖς ante δευτέροις et νοῦς ante μειζόνως. Hoc in paraphrasi sua jam expresserat Portus.
  • (7) A. μετέσχε. Tum τῆς τοῦ νοῦ. Hoc recepi. Argumentum quod attinet cf. Proclum in Platonis Theolog. I. 13 p. 35. II. 4. cum Scholio p. 89 sq. et III. 7. p. 131 sq. ubi, Parmenidis, Platonis, Plotini, aliorum sententiae examinantur.

Numbered νζ΄ in Creuzer's edition.

Edition
Creuzer, Frankfurt, 1822 — Initia philosophiae ac theologiae ex Platonicis fontibus ducta, Pars III
Scan
archive.org
OCR status
none
Translator
Wroot Press draft
Marsilio FicinoPlotini opera (Latin translation)Plotini opera, Florence 1492, with the argumentum to III.8translationnode only

Ficino's Latin and argumentum carried this treatise's account of nature to the Renaissance; it waits on plate work in incunable type.

No text is shown here. This witness stands as a node: what it is, where it is, and what it does to the text — nothing quoted that has not been read against the page it is quoted from.

Edition
Ficino, Florence, 1492
OCR status
none

This page is draft — the English on it has not yet been through review.