Neoplatonism.org

Ennead I.6 [1], On Beauty, chapter 3

γινώσκει δὲ αὐτὸ ἡ ἐπ’ αὐτὸ…

How the soul judges beauty, by holding the thing against a form it already has, as against a rule. Then the hard cases of chapter 1 are answered one by one: colour and fire are beautiful as light and form, and music as the unseen harmony that makes the heard one.

What it drew on

Outside the pilot

The ancestor of this chapter is the Phaedrus and the Timaeus on fire and form, and Plato is deliberately outside this library, which begins with Plotinus. The place above the text is empty because the source is out of scope, not because it is unknown.

Editorial scope: the fourteen names of the landing chain begin at Plotinus.

The text

porphyrian I.6 · chronological 1 · chapter 3 · volkmann page 87-88

γινώσκει δὲ αὐτὸ ἡ ἐπ’ αὐτὸ δύναμις τεταγμένη, ἧς οὐδὲν κυριώτερον εἰς κρίσιν τῶν ἑαυτῆς, ὅταν καὶ ἡ ἄλλη συνεπικρίνῃ ψυχή. τάχα δὲ καὶ αὐτὴ λέγει συναρμόττουσα τῷ παρ’ αὐτῇ εἴδει κἀκείνῳ πρὸς τὴν κρίσιν χρωμένη ὥσπερ κανόνι τοῦ εὐθέος. πῶς δὲ συμφωνεῖ τὸ περὶ σῶμα τῷ πρὸ σώματος; πῶς δὲ τὴν ἔξω οἰκίαν τῷ ἔνδον οἰκίας εἴδει ὁ οἰκοδομικὸς συναρμόσας καλὴν εἶναι λέγει; ἢ ὅτι ἐστὶν ἡ ἔξω, εἰ χωρίσειας τοὺς λίθους, τὸ ἔνδον εἶδος μερισθὲν τῷ ἔξω ὕλης ὄγκῳ, ἀμερὲς ὂν ἐν πολλοῖς φανταζόμενον. ὅταν οὖν ἡ αἴσθησις τὸ ἐν σώμασιν εἶδος ἴδῃ συνδησάμενον καὶ κρατῆσαν τῆς φύσεως τῆς ἐναντίας ἀμόρφου οὔσης καὶ μορφὴν ἐπὶ ἄλλαις μορφαῖς ἐκπρεπῶς ἐποχουμένην, συνελοῦσα ἀθρόον αὐτὸ τὸ πολλαχῇ ἀνήνεγκέ τε καὶ εἰσήγαγεν εἰς τὸ εἴσω ἀμερὲς ἤδη καὶ ἔδωκε τῷ ἔνδον σύμφωνον καὶ συναρμόττον καὶ φίλον: οἷα ἀνδρὶ ἀγαθῷ προσηνὲς ἐπιφαινόμενον ἀρετῆς ἴχνος ἐν νέῳ συμφωνοῦν τῷ ἀληθεῖ τῷ ἔνδον. τὸ δὲ τῆς χρόας κάλλος ἁπλοῦν μορφῇ καὶ κρατήσει τοῦ ἐν ὕλῃ σκοτεινοῦ, παρουσίᾳ φωτὸς ἀσωμάτου καὶ λόγου καὶ εἴδους ὄντος. ὅθεν καὶ τὸ πῦρ αὐτὸ παρὰ τὰ ἄλλα σώματα καλόν, ὅτι τάξιν εἴδους πρὸς τὰ ἄλλα στοιχεῖα ἔχει, ἄνω μὲν τῇ θέσει, λεπτότατον δὲ τῶν ἄλλων σωμάτων, ὡς ἐγγὺς ὂν τοῦ ἀσωμάτου, μόνον δὲ αὐτὸ οὐκ εἰσδεχόμενον τὰ ἄλλα: τὰ δὲ ἄλλα δέχεται αὐτό. θερμαίνεται γὰρ ἐκεῖνα, οὐ ψύχεται δὲ τοῦτο, κέχρωσταί τε πρώτως, τὰ δὲ ἄλλα παρὰ τούτου τὸ εἶδος τῆς χρόας λαμβάνει. λάμπει οὖν καὶ στίλβει, ὡς ἂν εἶδος ὄν. τὸ δὲ μὴ κρατούμενον ἐξίτηλον τῷ φωτὶ γινόμενον οὐκέτι καλόν, ὡς ἂν τοῦ εἴδους τῆς χρόας οὐ μετέχον ὅλου. αἱ δὲ ἁρμονίαι αἱ ἐν ταῖς φωναῖς ἀφανεῖς τὰς φανερὰς ποιήσασαι καὶ ταύτῃ τὴν ψυχὴν σύνεσιν τοῦ καλοῦ λαβεῖν ἐποίησαν, ὡς ἐν ἄλλῳ τὸ αὐτὸ δείξασαι. παρακολουθεῖ δὲ ταῖς αἰσθηταῖς μετρεῖσθαι ἀριθμοῖς ἐν λόγῳ οὐ παντί, ἀλλ’ ὃς ἂν ᾖ δουλεύων εἰς ποίησιν εἴδους εἴς [τε] τὸ κρατεῖν. καὶ περὶ μὲν τῶν ἐν αἰσθήσει καλῶν, ἃ δὴ εἴδωλα καὶ σκιαί, [αἳ] οἷον ἐκδραμοῦσαι εἰς ὕλην ἐλθοῦσαι ἐκόσμησάν τε καὶ διεπτόησαν φανεῖσαι, τοσαῦτα.

And the power ordained for this recognises it — no power has more authority in judging what belongs to it — when the rest of the soul judges along with it. Or perhaps the soul itself speaks, fitting the thing to the form it has with it and using that for the judgement, as a rule is used for what is straight. But how does what is about body agree with what is before body? How does the builder, having fitted the outer house to the form of the house within, say that it is beautiful? Is it that the outer house, if you were to take away the stones, is the inner form divided by the outward mass of matter — partless, but appearing in many? So when sense-perception sees the form in bodies binding together and mastering the nature opposed to it, which is shapeless, and a shape riding conspicuously upon other shapes, it gathers into one what was scattered, and carries it up, and brings it within, now partless, and gives it to what is within as something in concord with it, fitting it, and dear to it: as a trace of virtue appearing in the young is pleasing to a good man, being in concord with the truth within him. The beauty of colour is simple, by shape and by the mastery of the darkness in matter, through the presence of a light that is incorporeal and is rational form and form. That is why fire itself, beyond the other bodies, is beautiful: it has the rank of form toward the other elements, above them in position and the finest of the other bodies, as being near the incorporeal; and it alone does not receive the others, while the others receive it. For they are warmed, but it is not cooled; it is coloured primarily, and the others take the form of colour from it. So it shines and glitters, as being form. What is not mastered, fading in the light, is no longer beautiful, as not participating in the whole form of colour. The harmonies in sounds, the unseen ones that make the audible ones, have in this way too made the soul grasp the beautiful, showing the same thing in another medium. It belongs to perceptible harmonies to be measured by numbers — not in every ratio, but in one that serves the making of form, so that it may master. So much, then, for the beautiful things in sense-perception, which are images and shadows that, as it were, run out and come into matter, and adorn it, and thrill us when they appear.

ἐν λόγῳ in the fourth paragraph is 'ratio', the ordinary sense (glossary). Volkmann brackets τε and αἳ as deletions; the English follows the text with both removed.

Apparatus
  • [Volkmann p.87, l.28] Accent restored from the plate.
  • [Volkmann p.88, l.13] ὂν as printed; the transcription reads ἂν.
  • [Volkmann p.88, l.26] Volkmann brackets τε as a deletion; the transcription drops the brackets.
  • [Volkmann p.88, l.28] Volkmann brackets αἳ as a deletion; the transcription drops the brackets.
  • The transcription encodes the elided forms παρ’ and δι’ as παῤ and δἰ; the printed elisions are restored (1 place).

Greek collated line by line against the Volkmann plate (vol. 1, pp. 87–88); every departure of the First1KGreek transcription from the printed page is corrected and recorded in the apparatus.

Edition
Volkmann, Leipzig, 1883-1884 — Bibliotheca Teubneriana
Scan
archive.org
Digital base
Volkmann, Teubner 1883-84 (First1KGreek, CC BY-SA 4.0)
OCR status
proofed
Translator
Wroot Press draft

What drew on it

Not yet looked for

Which sentences of Confessiones VII answer to which chapter of I.6 has not been worked out here; the margin names the passage without claiming the alignment.

Augustine of HippoConfessiones VIIConfessiones VII.10, 17 (PL 32)commentarynode only

Augustine reads the ascent of I.6 back into his own; the Latin is on disk but is not yet placed chapter by chapter.

No text is shown here. This witness stands as a node: what it is, where it is, and what it does to the text — nothing quoted that has not been read against the page it is quoted from.

Edition
Migne, Paris, 1861 — Patrologia Latina
Digital base
PL 32; Knoll, CSEL 33 (1896) (Corpus Corporum, PD Migne base)
OCR status
none
Marsilio FicinoPlotini opera (Latin translation)Plotini opera, Florence 1492, with the argumentum to I.6translationnode only

Ficino is the whole Latin West’s Plotinus; his argumentum to this treatise is the descendant that matters, and it waits on plate work in incunable type.

No text is shown here. This witness stands as a node: what it is, where it is, and what it does to the text — nothing quoted that has not been read against the page it is quoted from.

Edition
Ficino, Florence, 1492
OCR status
none
Marius VictorinusAdversus AriumAdversus Arium (PL 8)unnamed borrowingnode only

The carrier by whom Plotinian language reached Augustine’s Latin.

No text is shown here. This witness stands as a node: what it is, where it is, and what it does to the text — nothing quoted that has not been read against the page it is quoted from.

Edition
Migne, Paris, 1857 — Patrologia Latina
Digital base
PL 8 (Corpus Corporum, PD Migne base)
OCR status
none

This page is draft — the English on it has not yet been through review.